Ontological Metaphors in English Business Economics Terminology and Their Equivalence in Vietnamese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.3383Keywords:
ontological metaphor, business economics, translation equivalence, English for specific purposes, Vietnamese for specific purposesAbstract
This study investigates the use of ontological metaphors in the nomination of business economics terminology in English and their equivalent representations in Vietnamese. The research corpus comprises 357 English metaphorical terms and 365 corresponding Vietnamese terms, which were collected from business economics dictionaries and textbooks. The findings highlight that metaphorisation serves as a highly effective method for term nomination, evidenced by the prolific use of ontological metaphors in the business economics terminologies of both English and Vietnamese. By conceptualizing our experiences in terms of concrete objects, abstract business economics concepts – such as company, brand, market, business activity, industry, economy, price, cost, and capital – are symbolically represented as physical entities. The analysis reveals three primary methods employed when translating English terms into Vietnamese: (i) an English ontological metaphor is translated using the identical metaphor in Vietnamese (with differences mostly limited to word order), (ii) an English ontological metaphor is translated by a different metaphor in Vietnamese, (iii) the Vietnamese term utilizes a loanword or a descriptive translation. The study also discovers that, unlike in English-speaking countries, Vietnamese speakers do not extensively utilise the animal source domain to describe abstract business concepts. These findings are anticipated to provide valuable insight into the metaphorical nomination of business economics terminology in English and Vietnamese for economists, scholars, and language users.
References
Aksenova, A. (2022). The reconstruction of metaphorical mapping as an instrument of the pre-translation analysis of poetry. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2022(22), Article 2763. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2763
Antia, B. E. (2000). Terminology and language planning: An alternative framework of practice and discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.2
Banton, C. (2024). Business economics: Definitions and types. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/business-economics.asp
Combley, R. (2011). Cambridge business English dictionary. Cambridge University Press.
David, F. R. (2014). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
David, F. R. (2015). Quản trị chiến lược: Khái luận và các tình huống [Strategic management: Concepts and cases]. Economics Publishing House.
Dinh, V. S., Phan, T. C., & Le, T. D. (2024). Kinh tế Việt Nam giai đoạn 2018 – 2023: Thực trạng và triển vọng [Vietnam’s economy in the period 2018 – 2023: Current status and prospects]. Journal of Trade Science, 189, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.54404/JTS.2024.189V.01
Do, H. V. (2009). Từ điển thuật ngữ kinh tế – thương mại Anh-Việt [A dictionary of business economics terms in English and Vietnamese]. Transport Publishing House Company.
Gkalitsiou, K., & Kotsopoulos, D. (2023). When the going gets tough, leaders use metaphors and storytelling: A qualitative and quantitative study on communication in the context of COVID-19 and Ukraine crises. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040110
Ha, Q. N. (2012). Thuật ngữ học – Những vấn đề lý luận và thực tiễn [Terminology: Theory and practices]. Encyclopedia publisher.
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024a). Conceptual metaphor BUSINESS IS A JOURNEY in business terminology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(11), 3463–3470. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.15
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024b). Military affair and building as source domains in nominating strategic management terminology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 21(2), 161–180. http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL57/09.pdf
Hanh, N. T. T. (2025). Nghiên cứu hiện tượng đồng nghĩa thuật ngữ kinh tế thương mại trong tiếng Anh [Business terminological variants in English]. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 41(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5391
Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kageura, K. (2002). The dynamics of terminology: A descriptive theory of term formation and terminological growth. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.5
Khachmafova, Z., Ostrovskaya, T., & Skhalyakho, E. (2021). The conceptual design of oil-and-gas metaphorical terms. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, Article 11045. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127311045
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2014). Chiến lược đại dương xanh [Blue Ocean Strategy]. The Labour Publishing House.
Kos, P. (2019). Metaphor and metonymy as a means of economy of expression. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 16(1), 146–161. http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL39/pdf_doc/11.pdf
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z., Benczes, R., Rommel, A., & Szelid, V. (2024). Universality versus variation in the conceptualization of ANGER: A question of methodology. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34834
Krawiec, M. (2022). Conceptual metaphors as an organizational framework of the specialist language of IT. V&R unipress. https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737014526
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
L’Homme, M.-C. (2020). Lexical semantics for terminology: An introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.20
Martin, T. J., Abreu Salas, J. I., & Gutiérrez, Y. (2024). Exploring conceptual metaphor types in financial markets reporting: Mainstream vs. social media. ESP Today, 12(2), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.2.7
Moeller, S., & Brady, C. (2014). Intelligent M & A: Navigating the mergers and acquisitions minefield (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Moschandreas, M. (2000). Business economics (2nd ed.). Business Press.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towards a science of translating. Brill.
Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The theory and practice of translation. Brill.
Nordquist, R. (2023). Definition and examples of ontological metaphor. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/ontological-metaphor-term-1691453
Ohmae, K. (1982). The mind of the strategist: The art of Japanese business. McGraw-Hill Education.
Ohmae, K. (2020). Tư duy của chiến lược gia – Nghệ thuật kinh doanh Nhật bản [The mind of the strategist: The art of Japanese business]. The Labour Publishing House.
Orčić, L. S., & Gorčević, A. R. (2017). Metafora u terminološkim kolokacijama u engleskom i njihovi prevodni ekvivalenti u srpskom jeziku. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini, 47(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRFFP47-12461
Phuong, T. L. N., Mai, Q. N., Linh, D. D., & Nhung, T. H. D. (2024). A study on English-Vietnamese translation of advertising slogans from the perspective of Newmark’s translation methods. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(11), 3525–3534. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.21
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (2016). Chiến lược cạnh tranh [Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors]. Tre Publishing House.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A university grammar of English. Longman Group UK.
Sánchez Pérez, M. d. M., & Cortés de los Ríos, M. E. (2015). The financial language used to communicate the same socio-economic events in English and Spanish press through metaphors and metonymies. ESP Today, 3(2), 216–237. https://www.esptodayjournal.org/pdf/current_issue/8.12.2015/SANCHES_PEREZ&CORTES_DE_LOS_RIOS-full-text.pdf
Silaški, N. (2011). Animal metaphors in some business-related terms in English. Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu, 13(1), 565–576. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/32249400/43_Nadezda_Silaski-libre.pdf
Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2024). The explanatory function of metaphor scenario in the Serbian pro-vaccine discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34958
Terniievska, Ye. (2023). The role of conceptualization in human cognitive activity. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2023(23), Article 2985. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2985
Tuovila, A. (2022). Business activities: Definition and 3 main types. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/business-activities.asp
Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation (J. C. Sager & M.-J. Hamel, Trans. & Eds.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.11
WallStreetMojo. (2024). Business economics. https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/business-economics
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Thi Thuy Hahn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
