Creating Urban Heterotopia: Užupis in the Focus of Literature and Film (“Tūla” by Jurgis Kunčinas and “Ten Minutes Before the Flight of Icarus” by Arūnas Matelis)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11649/abs.2741

Keywords:

geocriticism, literary urban studies, heterotopia, thirdspace, Vilnius, Užupis, Jurgis Kunčinas, Arūnas Matelis

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and compare two representations of the Vilnius district of Užupis: the literary image created in the novel Tūla by Jurgis Kunčinas (1993) and the cinematic image provided in the documentary Ten Minutes Before the Flight of Icarus by Arūnas Matelis (1990). Applying the approaches of geocriticism, urban studies, and intermedial contexts allows to relate these images in terms of the dominant motifs of the sensorial experience of the city related to two representational strategies: observing and walking in the city. In the novel Tūla, different gazing modes make the urban space visible, and the protagonist’s walking links particular urban objects to the whole referential space. In this way, the analysis of the representation of Vilnius, especially Užupis, in Tūla highlights the links between the construction of the fictional urban space and the structure of the city novel. Ten Minutes Before the Flight of Icarus focuses on the district of Užupis and the everyday life of its residents. The street-level camera eye matches the gaze of the potential perceiver and his bodily ability to grasp the space haptically, i.e. by footsteps. The movement on foot is essential as it connects all the spatial points into one entity and highlights a permanent link between walking in the city and storytelling as reading or writing. Ultimately, both representational strategies allow qualifying the area of Užupis as the “other” space or a heterotopia due to its distinctive language, which is also a bodily practice, intrinsic to both texts.

References

Arlauskaitė, N. (2019). Lions, boxers and other Vilnius inhabitants. In E. Grigoravičienė & U. Paberžytė (Eds.), Animal-human-robot (pp. 88–92). MO Muziejus. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12910

Auge, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso.

Baldick, C. (2001). The concise Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford University Press.

Barthes, R. (1988). Semiology and urbanism. In R. Barthes, The semiotic challenge (R. Howard, Trans.; pp. 191–201). Hill and Wang.

Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades project (H. Eiland & K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Bidlauskienė, G. (2019). Jurgio Kunčino Tūlos Vilnius: Nuo miesto praktikų – prie teksto strategijų. Colloquia, 43, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.51554/Col.2019.28642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51554/Col.2019.28642

de Certeau, M. (1980). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press.

Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Gallimard.

Foucault, M. (1997). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. In N. Leach (Ed.), Rethinking architecture: A reader in cultural theory (pp. 350–356). Routledge.

Kowerko-Urbańczyk, M. (2013a). Wilno jako projekt nienostalgiczny: Litewska proza wobec wielokulturowości i palimpsestowości Wilna. Porownania, 12, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.14746/p.2013.12.11053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/p.2013.12.11053

Kowerko-Urbańczyk, M. (2013b). Wilno-Vilnius: Polskie i litewskie reprezentacje miasta po roku 1990. Adam Mickiewicz University. https://www.lituanistika.lt/content/63753

Kunčinas, J. (1993). Tūla. LRS leidykla.

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing.

Matelis, A. (Director). (1990). Ten minutes before the flight of Icarus [Film]. Arunas Matelis for Lithuanian Film Studio.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). L’Oeil et l’esprit. Gallimard. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1522/030824586

Moretti, F. (2007). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for literary history. Verso.

Snezhko, IU. (2015). Geterotopii Vilʹniusa v sovremennom litovskom romane: Panorama kak prostranstvo nepovsednevnosti. Literatūra, 57(5), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.15388/Litera.2015.5.10215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Litera.2015.5.10215

Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.

Tally, R. T., Jr., & Drakakis, J. (2012). Spatiality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082881

Toporov, V. N. (2003). Peterburgskiĭ tekst russkoĭ literatury: Izbrannye trudy. Iskusstvo-SPB.

http://biblio.imli.ru/index.php/ruslit/100-toporov-vn-peterburgskij-tekst-russkoj-literatury-2003

Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.

Venclova, T. (2014). Romanas be melagysčių (D. Mitaitė, Trans.). In T. Venclova, Pertrūkis tikrovėje: Straipsniai apie literatūrą ir kultūrą (pp. 78–82). Lietuvių literaturos ir tausakos institutas.

Vidugirytė-Pakerienė, I. (2014). Vilnius: Mapping literature – reading city text. In C. Lévy & B. Westphal (Eds.), Géocritique: État des lieux / Geocriticism: A survey (pp. 252–258). PULIM.

Vidugirytė-Pakerienė, I., Briedis, L., Laukkonen, T., & Snezhko, J. (2014). Project “Mapping Vilnius Literature”. Retrieved December 11, 2021, from http://www.vilniusliterature.flf.vu.lt/en/?page_id=18

Westphal, B. (2007). La Geocritique: Reel, fiction, espace. Editions de Minuit.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31