The Cognitive Discourse Parameters of Directive Speech Acts in Modern Ukrainian

Authors

  • Oleksandr Mezhov Волинський національний університет імені Лесі Українки [Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University], Lutsk , Волинський національний університет імені Лесі Українки [Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University], Łuck https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5299-417X (unauthenticated)
  • Nataliia Kostusiak Волинський національний університет імені Лесі Українки [Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University], Lutsk , Волинський національний університет імені Лесі Українки [Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University], Łuck https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9795-6038 (unauthenticated)
  • Maryna Navalna Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України [National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine], Kyiv , Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України [National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine], Kijów https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-3122 (unauthenticated)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2785

Keywords:

directive speech acts, performative utterances, imperatives, infinitives, indirect utterances, subject, predicate, recipient, rheme, Ukrainian

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive multifaceted analysis of directive speech acts (based on modern media texts from the popular Ukrainian newspaper Day) taking into account the following approaches: 1) cognitive-semantic, with the projection of directive statements on extra-lingual reality, the study of their propositional-syntactic structure, and semantic relations between components; 2) formal-grammatical, which involves the identification of morphological and syntactic means of expression of motivation and the specifics of the positional structure of sentences; 3) communicative-syntactic, which allows for the characterization of directive statements in terms of their intonation and actual articulation; 4) communicative-pragmatic and discursive, which focuses on the specifics of certain types of directive speech acts in specific discourses, their perlocutionary effect, pragmatic intentions of the speakers, their communicative strategies and tactics, the interaction of the addresser and the recipient and more.

Directive speech acts with infinitives, verbs of imperative, conditional and optative moods, present, past and future tenses, which are based on performative constructions, are distinguished from the formal-grammatical point of view. They all have the same propositional meaning, which at the semantic-syntactic level of the sentence is implemented in the following obligatory syntaxemes: the subject (speaker), the predicate of volitional action, the recipient of volitional action or the potential subject of action, and the predicate of potential action. In specific communicative acts, the syntaxeme of the subject of volitional action is correlated with the recipient of speech, i.e., the speaker expressing the communicative intention of motivation, and the complex syntax of the recipient of volitional action-subject of potential action – with the recipient of speech, i.e., the interlocutor from whom the speaker expects on his volition. The core of directive speech acts is formed by sentences with verbs in the imperative mood (imperatives) and vocatives. The periphery is formed by indirect statements (including narrative, interrogative, conditional), the motivational modality of which is due to context or extra-lingual situation. Verbal predicates as the centre of directive speech acts, with the semantics of order, command, request, supplication, imploration, persuasion, invitation, permission, demand, coercion, appeal, instruction, direction, recommendation, suggestion, warning, precaution, advice, admonition, preaching, etc., are usually in a communicative position rheme with the actual articulation of statements.

References

Batsevych, F. S. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoï linhvistyky. Akademiia.

Dziob, A., & Piasecki, M. (2018). Dynamic verbs in the Wordnet of Polish. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2018(18), Article 1718. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1718

Formanova, S. V., & Veĭda, T. M. (2011). Dyrektyvni movlennievi akty iak sposib suhestyvnoho vplyvu u zhurnalistsʹkomu dyskursi. Naukovi pratsi Kam’ianetsʹ-Podilʹsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka: Seriia. Filolohichni nauky, 2011(25), 320–322.

Kharchenko, S. V. (2001). Semantyko-syntaksychna i komunikatyvna struktura rechenʹ sponukalʹnoï modalʹnosti [Unpublished summary of doctoral dissertation]. Natsionalʹnyĭ pedahohichnyĭ universytet imeni M. P. Drahomanova.

Kostusiak, N. M. (2012). Funktsiĭni oznaky hramemy sponukalʹnoï syntaksychnoï modalʹnosti. Volynʹ filolohichna: Tekst i kontekst, 2012(14), 63–75.

Miasoiedova, S. V. (2001). Katehoriia sponukannia i ïï vyrazhennia v nepriamykh vyslovlenniakh suchasnoï ukraïnsʹkoï movy [Unpublished summary of doctoral dissertation]. Kharkivsʹkyĭ derzhavnyĭ pedahohichnyĭ universytet im. H. S. Skovorody.

Musatova, A. (2007). Paradyhmatyka ukraïnsʹkoho sponukalʹnoho rechennia. Linhvistychni studiï, 2007(15), 295–299.

Mykhaĭlova, L. V. (2015). Klasyfikatsiia dyrektyvnykh movlennievykh aktiv. Vcheni zapysky Kharkivsʹkoho humanitarnoho universytetu “Narodna ukraïnsʹka akademiia”, 21, 451–456.

Narushevych-Vasylʹieva, O. V. (2002). Katehoriia sponukalʹnosti u prahmastylistychnomu aspekti [Unpublished summary of doctoral dissertation]. Odesʹkyĭ natsionalʹnyĭ universytet im. I. I. Mechnykova.

Ostin, Dzh. L. (1986). Slovo kak deĭstvie. In Novoe v zarubezhnoĭ lingvistike (Vol. 17, pp. 22–130). Progress.

Piddubsʹka, I. V. (2001). Modalʹna i temporalʹna transpozytsiia diieslivnykh form [Unpublished summary of doctoral dissertation]. Donetsʹkyĭ natsionalʹnyĭ universytet.

Popova, O. V., & Khoruzhenko, M. V. (2016). Implikovana vs eksplikovana skladovi dyrektyviv u vykonavchykh nakazakh Baraka Obamy. Naukovi zapysky: Seriia. Filolohichni nauky, 2016(145), 213–217.

Przepiórkowski, A. (2017). On the argument adjunct distinction in the Polish Semantic Syntax tradition. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2017(17), Article 1344. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1344

Serlʹ, Dzh. R. (1986). Chto takoe rechevoĭ akt? In Novoe v zarubezhnoĭ lingvistike (Vol. 17, pp. 151–169). Progress.

Shabat-Savka, S. T. (2013). Nepriami vyslovlennia u systemi syntaksychnykh reprezentantiv katehoriï komunikatyvnoï intentsiï. Linhvistychni studiï, 2013(27), 122–127.

Shatilova, O. (2013). Pytalʹni rechennia iak vyraznyky sponukalʹnoï modalʹnosti. Linhvistychni studiï, 2013(27), 127–131.

Vykhovanetsʹ, I. R. (1992). Narysy z funktsionalʹnoho syntaksysu ukraïnsʹkoï movy. Naukova dumka.

Zahnitko, A. P. (2001). Teoretychna hramatyka ukraïnsʹkoï movy: Syntaksys. DonNU.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

Issue

Section

Cognitive Approaches to Semantics and Contrastive Linguistics