Koalicja chętnych i pronatowskich: Rosyjsko-ukraiński dyskurs antywojenny
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.3037Słowa kluczowe:
NATO, ideologia, analiza dyskursu, lingwistyka korpusowa, metafora pojęciowa, Biden, dyskurs wojenny rosyjsko-ukraińskiAbstrakt
Ideologia NATO, czy też natoizm, od dziesięcioleci stanowi część amerykańskich i europejskich programów politycznych. Ideologia ta przekształciła jednobiegunowy system rządzenia reprezentowany przez Stany Zjednoczone. Jednak natoizm nie tylko pobudza poczucie własnej przynależności i uznanie dla unii na rzecz współpracy wojskowej i bezpieczeństwa w państwach pronatowskich, lecz także wywołuje alarmującą panikę i obawy w krajach antynatowskich, wyzwalając nieświadomy wyścig o przetrwanie najsilniejszych. Świat doświadcza obecnie obu tych stanów, dyskursywnie przeformułowanych przez elity polityczne. W niniejszym badaniu zastosowano multidyscyplinarne podejście do analizy dyskursu NATO i jego wpływu na tworzenie jednobiegunowych koalicji. Metody analizy dyskursu, lingwistyki korpusowej i lingwistyki kognitywnej zostały wykorzystane w analizie przemówień Joe Bidena w celu ujawnienia jego roli w konstruowaniu ideologii pronatowskich w stosunkach międzynarodowych oraz pokazania sposobów, jakimi wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska zdekontekstualizowała mentalną strukturę tożsamości NATO. Wyniki pokazały, że pewne strategie dyskursu były nierozerwalnie związane z konstruowaniem koalicji skłonnych do walki z wrogością Rosji.
Bibliografia
Altamimi, S. (2023a). Apocalyptic representation of COVID-19: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the World Health Organization's discourse practices. Discourse and Interaction, 16(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-1-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2023-1-25
Altamimi, S. (2023b). Navigating the financial frontier: A serendipitous journey between corpus linguistics and discourse analysis of economy in parliamentary speeches. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 747. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02267-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02267-9
Amaireh, H. (2023). Biden’s rhetoric: A corpus-based study of the political speeches of the American President Joe Biden. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(3), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1303.22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1303.22
Archer, D., Wilson, A., & Rayson, P. (2002, October). Introduction to the USAS category system. Benedict project report. UCREL, Lancaster University. Retrieved December 11, 2022, from https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/usas%20guide.pdf
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (Eds.). (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738
Baker, P., & McGlashan, M. (2020). Critical discourse analysis. In S. Adolphs & D. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 220–241). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003031758-13
Baker, P., Vessey, R., & McEnery, T. (2021). The language of violent Jihad. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108363365
Barma, N. H. (2024). failed state. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/failed-state
Beeres, R., Bakx, G., de Waard, E., & Rietjens, S. (Eds.). (2016). NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2016: Organizing for Safety and Security in Military Organizations. Springer; T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-135-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-135-7
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
Brewer, M. D., & Stonecash, J. M. (2007). Split: Class and cultural divides in American politics. CQ Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483330532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483330532
Briefing room. (n.d.). The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/
Call, C. T. (2008). The fallacy of the “failed state”. Third World Quarterly, 29(8), 1491–1507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802544207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802544207
Cheng, M. (2022). Theoretical framework for ecological discourse analysis: A summary of New developments of ecological discourse analysis. Journal of World Languages, 8(1), 188–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0030
Cheng, W. (2012). Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802632
Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold War discourse from containment to common house. Peter Lang.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Citron, F. M. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(11), 2585–2595. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654
Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015952
Darong, H. C. (2021). Interpersonal function of Joe Biden’s victory speech (systemic functional linguistics view). Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.31420
Deane, P. D. (1992). Grammar in mind and brain: Explorations in cognitive syntax. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886535
de Hoop Scheffer, J. (2007). Defence of security and shared values. NATO OTAN. https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2007/s070301a-e.html
de Zayas, A. (2022, January 24). NATO as religion. CounterPunch. https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/01/24/nato-as-religion
Di John, J. (2010). The concept, causes and consequences of failed states: A critical review of the literature and agenda for research with specific reference to Sub-Saharan Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 22, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2009.44
Fairclough, N. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(6), 739–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5
Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1996). Language and power. Longman.
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication, 11(6), 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
Fox, C. (2015). Political authority, practical identity, and binding citizens. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2015.1020827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2015.1020827
galvanize (n.d.). In Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/galvanize?q=galvanize
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., & Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Hodder Arnold. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Hamilton, D. S., & Spohr, K. (Eds.). (2019). Open door: NATO and Euro-Atlantic security after the Cold War. Johns Hopkins University.
Hampe, B. (2005). Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction. In B. Hampe & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532
Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 1–14). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009
Helman, G. B., & Ratner, S. R. (1992). Saving failed states. Foreign Policy, 89(Winter), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1149070
Hendriks, H., van den Putte, B., & de Bruijn, G.-J. (2014). Changing the conversation: The influence of emotions on conversational valence and alcohol consumption. Prevention Science, 15, 684–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0418-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0418-2
Johnson, J. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
Johnson, M. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe & J. E. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–34). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15
Keltner, D., Haidt, J., & Shiota, M. N. (2006). Social functionalism and the evolution of emotions. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 115–142). Psychosocial Press.
Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: “Possessive, jealous and pugnacious”? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x
Kozaryn, L. D. (2000, April 6). SHAPE considers troop needs for Kosovo Force. U. S. Department of Defense. Retrieved February 21, 2023, from http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=45087
Kuo, S. (2002). From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text, 22(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.004
Lakoff, G. (1987a). Cognitive models and prototype theory. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 63–100). Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987b). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about thought. University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In G. Lakoff, Metaphor and thought (A. Ortony, Ed.; 2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
Lawson, S. (2012). Putting the “war” in cyberwar: Metaphor, analogy, and cybersecurity discourse in the United States. First Monday, 17(7), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i7.3848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i7.3848
Levinson, S. (1993). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Almaged, S. (2020). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain: A corpus-assisted discourse study of Labour and
Conservative Party leaders’ speeches, 1900–2014. In E. Gómez-Jiménez & M. Toolan (Eds.), The discursive construction of economic inequality: CADS approaches to the British media (pp. 13–32). Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350111318.0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350111318.0010
Mǎdroane, I. D. (2012). Roma, Romanian, European: A media framed battle over identity. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 5(2), 102–119.
Martin, J. (2015). Situating speech: A rhetorical approach to political strategy. Political Studies, 63(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12039
Mattox, G., & Rachwald, A. (2001). Introduction: European security and the enlargement of NATO. In L. Rienner (Ed.), Enlarging NATO: The national debates (pp. 1--12). Lynne Rienner Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626373396-003
McArthur, T. (1981). Longman lexicon of contemporary English. Longman.
Mlodinow, L. (2022). Emotional: how feelings shape our thinking. Pantheon.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2022). Operations and missions: Past and present. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_52060.htm
Nurkhamidah, N., Fahira, R. Z., & Ningtyas, A. R. (2021). Rhetorical analysis of Joe Biden’s inauguration address. Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, 7(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32505/jl3t.v7i2.3371
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (2022). The cognitive structure of emotions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108934053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108934053
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Partington, A. (2010). Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0101
Renaldo, Z. A. (2021). Presupposition and ideology: A critical discourse analysis of Joe Biden’s inaugural speech. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(3), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p497-503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p497-503
Rotberg, R. I. (2003). Failed states, collapsed states, weak states: Causes and indicators. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), State failure and state weakness in a time of terror (pp. 1–25). World Peace Foundation; Brookings Institution Press.
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.5.805
Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2010). The birth of High Gods: How cultural evolution of supernatural policing influenced the emergent of complex, cooperative human societies, paving the way for civilization. In M. Schaller, A. Norenzayan, S. J. Heine, T.
Yamagishi, & T. Kameda (Eds.), Evolution, culture, and the human mind (pp. 119–136). Psychology Press.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta‐analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00813.x
Spielberger, C. (Ed.). (2002). Encyclopedia of applied psychology. PUP.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (Eds.). (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895
Talbott, S. (1998). Opening doors and building bridges in the new Europe. U.S. Department of State Dispatch; Washington, 9(1), 9–13.
Tardy, T. (2021). The risks of NATO’s maladaptation. European Security, 30(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1799786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1799786
Thibodeau, P. H., & Flusberg, S. J. (2022). Metaphor and elaboration in context. In H. L. Colston, T. Matlock, & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Dynamism in metaphor and beyond (pp. 223–240). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.9.12thi
UCREL Semantic Analysis System (USAS). (n.d.). http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/
van Dijk, T. A. (1986). News schemata. In S. Greenbaum & C. R. Cooper (Eds.), Studying writing: Linguistic approaches (pp. 155–186). Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Key-note address Congress Political Linguistics. Antwerp, 7–9 December 1995. In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Wiley Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytical approaches to political discourse (pp. 204–237). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.4.11dij
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Ideología y discurso. Ariel.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006a). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
van Dijk, T. A. (2006b). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideology, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
Walton, D. (2004). Informal logic. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT=EMNLP-05),
Vancouver, Canada (pp. 347–354). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220619
Wodak, R. (2001a). The discourse-historical analysis of the rhetoric of racism and anti-Semitism. In M. Reisigl & R. Wodak (Eds.), Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism (pp. 31–90). Routledge.
Wodak, R. (2001b). What CDA is about: A summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Sadiq Altamimi
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
