Human Source Domain in Metaphorizing Corporate Terminology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.3355Keywords:
corporate term, human source domain, metaphorical term, metaphorizationAbstract
This study attempts to apply the theory of conceptual metaphor to investigate the cognitive mechanism of metaphorisation in corporate terminology mapped from the human source domain. The corpus comprising 299 metaphorical corporate terms collected from business dictionaries, books and authentic business discourses was analysed with the Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit in this qualitative research. The study grouped the collected metaphorical terms into four metaphors, namely CORPORATE LIFE CYCLE IS HUMAN LIFE CYCLE, CORPORATE CHARACTERISTICS ARE HUMAN CHARACTERISTICS, CORPORATE ACTIVITIES ARE HUMAN ACTIVITIES, and CORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS ARE HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS. Numerous human attributes transfer to those of companies via detailed mappings: the progress or development of corporations corresponds to the natural growth of human beings; companies are identified as citizens; corporate personality is viewed as human personality; corporate strength is described as human physical strength; corporate competence is considered as human competence; corporate activities are understood by means of human activities; corporations are conceptualised as families; merger and acquisition are similar to a marriage, while divestitures are comprehended as divorces; the relationship between a company and its stakeholders is identified as human social relationships. The findings strengthen metaphorisation as a productive way of enriching specialised vocabulary.
References
Ahrens, K. (2010). Mapping principles for conceptual metaphors. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 185–207). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.12ahr
Alekseeva, L., Mishlanova, S., & Picht, H. (2020). The metaphor cycle in a term-formation process. Terminologija / Terminology, 27, 58–80. https://doi.org/10.35321/term27-03
Allred, B. B., Boal, K. B., & Holstein, W. K. (2005). Corporations as stepfamilies: A new metaphor for explaining the fate of merged and acquired companies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(3), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2005.18733213
Antia, B. E. (2000). Terminology and language planning: An alternative framework of practice and discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.2
Benczes, R., Benczes, I., Ságvári, B., & Szabó, L. P. (2024). When life is no longer a journey: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the metaphorical conceptualization of LIFE among Hungarian adults – a representative survey. Cognitive Linguistics, 35(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2023-0050
Bloomenthal, A. (2024). Splitup: Definition and purposes in business, example. Investopedia. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/split-up.asp
Celiešienė, V., & Juzelėnienė, S. (2019). Metaphorical nomination in IT terminology in Lithuanian and English languages. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0006
Ciobanu, G. (1997). Introduction to terminology. Editura Politechnica.
Combley, R. (2011). Cambridge business English dictionary. Cambridge University Press.
Cornelissen, J., & Harris, P. (2001). The corporate identity metaphor: Perspectives, problems and prospects. Journal of Marketing Management, 17(1–2), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257012571456
David, F. R. (2014). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2001). The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540137
Denroche, C. (2024). Drawing as a tool in metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 39(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2307333
Dooley, K. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Merger as marriage: Communication issues in post-merger integration. Health Care Management Review, 28(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004010-200301000-00007
Gaughan, P. A. (2018). Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119380771
Gibbs, R. W. (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
Gkalitsiou, K., & Kotsopoulos, D. (2023). When the going gets tough, leaders use metaphors and storytelling: A qualitative and quantitative study on communication in the context of COVID-19 and Ukraine crises. Administrative Sciences, 13(4), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13040110
Gorokhova, N. V., & Kubyshko, I. N. (2020). Metaphorization of special terms as the semantic development process in oil and gas discourse. In Z. Anikina (Ed.), Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives (pp. 261–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47415-7_27
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024a). Conceptual metaphor BUSINESS IS A JOURNEY in business terminology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(11), 3463–3470. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.15
Hanh, N. T. T. (2024b). Military affair and building as source domains in nominating strategic management terminology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 21(2), 161–180. http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL57/09.pdf
Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (new 9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hung, N. T. (2025). Ảnh hưởng của mức độ công bố thông tin trách nhiệm xã hội đến giá trị doanh nghiệp – nghiên cứu tại các công ty niêm yết trên thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam [Impact of social responsibility information disclosure on firm value – Case in listed companies on Vietnam Stock Market]. Journal of Trade Science, 200, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.54404/JTS.2025.200V.01
Kageura, K. (2002). The dynamics of terminology: A descriptive theory of term formation and terminological growth. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.5
Khachmafova, Z., Ostrovskaya, T., & Skhalyakho, E. (2021). The conceptual design of oil-and-gas metaphorical terms. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, Article 11045. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127311045
Koller, V. (2009). Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 45–72). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.45
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z., Benczes, R., Rommel, A., & Szelid, V. (2024). Universality versus variation in the conceptualization of ANGER: A question of methodology. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34834
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 (Original work published 1980).
Law, J. (2009). A dictionary of business and management. Oxford University Press.
Lombard, C. G. (2005). Conceptual metaphors in computer networking terminology. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 23(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610509486382
Moeller, S., & Brady, C. (2014). Intelligent M & A: Navigating the mergers and acquisitions minefield (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Néron, P., & Norman, W. (2008). Corporations as citizens: Political not metaphorical: A reply to critics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1052150X00008150
Organizational life cycle. (2025). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_life_cycle
Ptiček, M., & Dobša, J. (2023). Methods of annotating and identifying metaphors in the field of Natural Language Processing. Future Internet, 15, Article 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060201
Sherizatova, Zh. Zh. (2019). Metaphor is a productive way in the formation of medical terminology. Vestnik Karagandinskogo universiteta / Bulletin of the Karaganda University: Ser. Filologiia/Philology, 2019(2(94)). https://philology-vestnik.buketov.edu.kz/philology-vestnik/article/view/62/57
Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2010). The conceptualization of the global financial crisis via the economy is a person metaphor: A contrastive study of English and Serbian. Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 129–139. http://facta.junis.ni.ac.rs/lal/lal201002/lal201002-04.pdf
Silaški, N., & Đurović, T. (2024). The explanatory function of metaphor scenario in the Serbian pro-vaccine discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34958
Steen, G., Dorst, A., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14
Sun, Y., & Jiang, J. (2014). Metaphor use in Chinese and US corporate mission statements: A cognitive sociolinguistic analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.005
Terniievska, Y. (2023). The role of conceptualization in human cognitive activity. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2023(23), Article 2985. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2985
Twin, A. (2024). Unlock business success: Build core competencies for a competitive edge. Investopedia. Retrieved March 11, 2024, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/core_competencies.asp
Xu, Y., Royce, T., & Hu, C. (2023). ECONOMY IS HUMAN – A corpus-based comparative study in English and Chinese economic media discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics [Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association], 21(2), 411–443. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00140.xu
Zhao, Q., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C.-R. (2022). Linguistic synesthesia is metaphorical: A lexical-conceptual account. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(3), 553–583. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0098
Zibin, A., Khalifah, L., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2024). The role of metaphor in creating polysemy complexes in Jordanian Arabic and American English. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 28(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34555
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nguyen Thi Thuy Hahn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
